Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '18 at 03:51
Run Duration2110 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$139
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 260
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 660
68% 549 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 75.9
186% 75.9 fps
Poor: 51% Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 197 197 163 173 207 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 101
Write 84.7
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 189
27% 118 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 10.7
69% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 34.1
DQ Mixed 55.4
35% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 37%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 250GB-$90
45GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 84 137 75 75 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 331
Write 195
Mixed 216
SusWrite 105
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 24
102% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 206
161% 230 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 124 131 129 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 135
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 127
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 84%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137
316GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 174 180 176 180 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM48GU88N26-GIIHA0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 23.3
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 22.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $454
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback