Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 2650 APU R3 216 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	8.67% Terrible	Memory 11.7 1-Core 21.6 2-Core 23.1 11% 18.8 Pts	4-Core 31.4 8-Core 40.3 5% 35.8 Pts	64-Core 42.5 3% 42.5 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.67% Great: 32%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 113 118 183 155 131 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.6% Poor	Read 96.8 Write 78.8 Mixed 94.3 SusWrite 148 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 15.3 42% 14.8 MB/s	DQ Read 82.2 DQ Write 61.4 DQ Mixed 75.8 56% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 388 10% 388 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 453 samples	11x
Sempron 2650 APU R3AMDBench 24%, 216 samples	11x
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	9x
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	9x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	1x
SSDNow KC300 120GBKingston $80Bench 71%, 2,344 samples	1x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBUnknownBench 32%, 32 samples	2x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,879 samples	1x

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $20

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16