To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '18 at 15:39
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 79.2 2-Core 157 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 496 48% 395 Pts	64-Core 784 48% 784 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E376) CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.11.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 89.8 Parallax 164 87% 120 fps	MRender 86.7 Gravity 107 Splatting 129 90% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 220 220 221 220 219 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 463 Write 427 Mixed 240 SusWrite 234 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 21.3 82% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 65.2 DQ Mixed 82.4 72% 111 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 101%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 447GB free Firmware: 00RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 230 148 203 205 206 MB/s Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.9% Average	Read 249 Write 217 Mixed 198 SusWrite 204 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 15.3 59% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 41 48% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 276GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 106 116 118 118 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 105 Write 101 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 114 70% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5673FH0- Hynix HMT151R7AFP4C M393B5673FH0- Hynix HMT151R7AFP4C 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69% Good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 24.3 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	716x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	280x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	265x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	617x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	303x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16