bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1639 x 714 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140414
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateNov 12 '18 at 16:33
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 40.2
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 71
29% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 300
36% 277 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 51%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 184 189 180 131 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 310
Write 356
Mixed 358
SusWrite 170
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 15.2
52% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 134
102% 139 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 81%
Vmware Virtual disk 966GB
664GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 162 160 165 122 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 336
Write 337
Mixed 370
SusWrite 150
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 11.3
36% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 130
98% 130 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 64 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 42.4
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 11.8
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback