Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 22:22
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 129
50% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 328
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 30.8
21% 27.8 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 30.3
23% 27.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 256GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 136 128 116 97 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40% Below average
Read 320
Write 263
Mixed 212
SusWrite 139
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 15.5
52% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 81.8
DQ Write 32.9
DQ Mixed 60.2
44% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40%
Great: 76%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
503GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 128 127 131 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 81.7
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 128
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 500GB
450GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 89 88 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 77.7
Write 75.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 87.8
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback