HP 280 G1 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP 280 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B34
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150509
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateNov 01 '18 at 06:30
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User CMR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 44
1-Core 30
2-Core 52
27% 42 Pts
4-Core 86.3
8-Core 124
13% 105 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Nvidia(10DE 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 36.6
Parallax 43.9
26% 37.3 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 30.5
27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 64 63 65 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 66.1
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 69%
Mass Storage Device 500GB
292GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 15.2
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 16.1
21% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.4
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 280 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback