Today's hottest deals

Acer Gateway 4250s

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Gateway 4250s  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Laptop
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20151118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '18 at 09:50
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4 PRO-3340B HD Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 22.3
2-Core 59.6
31% 46.8 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 127
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8240
Device(1D05 1002) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.1.8000
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.47
Reflection 3.38
Parallax 1.72
1% 2.19 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 43 69 63 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 51.3
Write 36.7
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 61.3
32% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown A1_ 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gateway 4250s Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer Gateway 4250s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback