Today's hottest deals

Asrock AM1B-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock AM1B-M  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 23:04
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 24.7
2-Core 49.8
30% 43.9 Pts
4-Core 91.7
8-Core 97.7
12% 94.7 Pts
64-Core 84.2
5% 84.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
ASRock(1849 9830) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 2.84
2% 3.09 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 3.43
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 53 53 52 47 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 297
Write 101
Mixed 91
SusWrite 79.7
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 12.3
49% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 35.8
DQ Mixed 32
24% 32.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
465GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 124 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 123
Write 117
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 124
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5595-001.A00LF 6GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.5
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1B-M Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1B-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $22
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback