HP ProLiant MicroServer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP ProLiant MicroServer (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110729
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	May 29 '16 at 10:03
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II Neo N36L Dual-Core 91 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 39.7 29% 40.2 Pts	4-Core 40.2 8-Core 40.3 5% 40.2 Pts	64-Core 40.3 2% 40.3 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 133GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	63.8% Good	Read 119 Write 103 Mixed 105 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.1 64% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	38.9% Below average	Read 73.7 Write 61.6 Mixed 84.3 56% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.16 58% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 38GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	57.4% Above average	Read 105 Write 95.4 Mixed 88.3 72% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.16 68% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 83%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 37GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	69.2% Good	Read 116 Write 125 Mixed 127 93% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.21 89% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 18GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	75.4% Very good	Read 135 Write 128 Mixed 90.2 88% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.26 105% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 6.3 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant MicroServer

CPU
Turion II Neo N40LAMDBench 29%, 169 samples	9x
Turion II Neo N54LAMDBench 35%, 191 samples	4x
Athlon II Neo N36L Dual-CoreAMDBench 30%, 91 samples	2x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples	4x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $109Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	1x
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TBBench 15%, 425 samples	1x
SSD 120GBGigabyte $30Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	8x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16