Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 2.26GHz 19 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Memory 93.2 1-Core 16.8 2-Core 11.1 36% 40.4 Pts	4-Core 16.7 8-Core 17.1 2% 16.9 Pts	64-Core 22.7 1% 22.7 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Zotac(19DA 6222) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	0.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 0.59 0% 0.99 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 1.91 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST380215A 80GB-$50 723 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 0.9 1.8 1.2 7 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	2.1% Terrible	Read 4 Write 3.1 Mixed 2.4 SusWrite 3.3 2% 3.2 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 2.1% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 1.8 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.6 6% 2.23 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.5 2% 0.6 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM