HP ProLiant ML115 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant ML115 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant ML115 G1
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '18 at 05:39
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Dual-Core AMD Opteron 1210
PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 52.6
35% 49.6 Pts
4-Core 53.1
8-Core 53.2
7% 53.2 Pts
64-Core 52.9
3% 52.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 57.3
Write 9
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 10.1
17% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 40%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
7GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.8 2.5 5.5 8.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 28.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5
20% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
31% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback