HP 255 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 255 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F6
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180730
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 20 '18 at 18:15
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 37.5
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 51.6
24% 38 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 107
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
HP(103C 82F6) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.97
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 2.66
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.51 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000H1 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 100 99 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.1% Below average
Read 245
Write 131
Mixed 114
SusWrite 98.4
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 10
44% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 93.7
81% 120 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 101%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
4GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 25
Write 14.3
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 17.4
25% 19 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.4
89% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
851GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 26 24 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 26
Write 23.3
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 24.9
33% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback