Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory9.86GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9.86GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory7.5 GB free of 9.85938 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 11:25
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i7-8700K
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 46
2-Core 138
48% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 196
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Sapphire(174B E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.7.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 93.4
55% 76.6 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 55.3
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 117 140 131 170 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x9GB
1 of 1 slots used
9GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback