Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3220-$99 790 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 51.5 1-Core 24.3 2-Core 46 28% 40.6 Pts	4-Core 79.5 8-Core 83.7 11% 81.6 Pts	64-Core 91 6% 91 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570 12,360 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 2B20) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.77% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 7.19 Parallax 5.75 6% 6.71 fps	MRender 7.57 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 7.43 6% 6.75 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 5.5 13 39 6.9 16 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.8% Very poor	Read 138 Write 93.3 Mixed 77 SusWrite 32.6 19% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 8.4 38% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 12.7 DQ Write 26.2 DQ Mixed 16.3 13% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 256GB free Firmware: JPFOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 84 82 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	48.2% Average	Read 83.5 Write 82.8 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 84.4 54% 74.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM