Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory100GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 100GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory94.8 GB free of 100 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '18 at 07:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2643 0-$1,040
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 172
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 453
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200
Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 377.48
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.5% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 47.7
31% 42.2 fps
MRender 52.4
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 28.1
32% 41 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 432 446 425 420 415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 454
Mixed 357
SusWrite 417
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 33.9
118% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 42.7
75% 151 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 134%
Samsung SM84 256GB
192GB free
Firmware: 2D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 78 68 74 68 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 328
Write 131
Mixed 244
SusWrite 76.2
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 24.8
79% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 43
61% 115 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B5773CH0-YH9 Toshiba-0098 9965516-071.A00LF Toshiba-0098 9965516-071.A00LF Toshiba-0098 9965516-421.A00LF M393B5773CH0-YH9 Toshiba-0098 9965516-071.A00LF Toshiba-0098 9965516-071.A00LF Toshiba-0098 9965516-421.... 100GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 16384, 16384, 16384, 2048, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 30.6
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback