Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	15.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Memory 66.5 1-Core 60.8 2-Core 104 48% 77.2 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 109 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 83 103 91 110 86 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.1% Very poor	Read 78.4 Write 69.8 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 88.7 17% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 5.9 21% 6.23 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 8GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	5.61% Terrible	Read 16.6 Write 12 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 4.5 13% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 57% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.61% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16