QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 00:14
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 920
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 7 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 47.6
2-Core 81
46% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 320
33% 264 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 16.2
14% 15.7 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 17.2
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 48GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 24 75 78 52 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 174
Write 178
Mixed 104
SusWrite 66.2
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 5.8
985% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback