Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS V840

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS V840  (all builds)
MotherboardTyan D2533
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090723
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 12:25
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2384
CPU0-Socket 940, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 70.4
1-Core 31.2
2-Core 79.5
40% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 278
26% 219 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
Nvidia(10DE 065B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
9.49% Terrible
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 5.91
11% 9.42 fps
MRender 9.52
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 6.91
7% 8.97 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 100 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 186
Write 122
Mixed 136
SusWrite 97.3
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 26.1
96% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 94
DQ Mixed 39.1
37% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 73%
Fujitsu MBA3073RC 73GB
68GB free
Firmware: HPF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 115 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 78
SusWrite 115
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.5
297% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 66%
Samsung HD081GJ 80GB
58GB free
Firmware: GE10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 70 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 70
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 70.6
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
130% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB
95GB free
Firmware: KF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 67 66 67 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 66.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 66.4
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST31000528AS 500GB
340GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 90 90 91 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 90
69% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.3
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback