bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '18 at 05:43
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 204
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 402
51% 389 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Microsoft RemoteFX Graphics Device - WDDM
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Driver: rdvgumd64.dll Ver. 10.0.17134.1
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 11
Parallax 13.1
10% 12.3 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 16.4
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 86GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 38 38 41 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
3072, 1024 MB
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback