Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$192 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 178 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 431 40% 332 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% AMD(1002 2543) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 12.8 12% 13.1 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 12.7 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU700 240GB 791 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: B170428a SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 72 73 86 57 87 MB/s Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.7% Average	Read 249 Write 238 Mixed 230 SusWrite 75.3 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 24.6 88% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 92.2 82% 122 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M379B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.7% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.67 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	179x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	114x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	107x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 4x2GBNanyaBench 47%, 1,368 samples	54x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	52x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	41x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $331

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16