Biostar N68S3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar N68S3+  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '18 at 18:51
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 145-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Memory 25
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 19.9
20% 28.4 Pts
4-Core 21.3
8-Core 20.9
3% 21.1 Pts
64-Core 20.5
1% 20.5 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.56
1% 1.42 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.26
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 64 64 67 94 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 83
Mixed 27
SusWrite 71.4
52% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-026.A00LF 6GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 3.3
6% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 286
14% 286 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68S3+ Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar N68S3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback