Asrock HM55-MXM

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock HM55-MXM (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '18 at 15:17
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 90 43% 68 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 92.6 14% 102 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M 3,013 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1B0A 9077) 1GB CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.92 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.8% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 3.96 Parallax 3.16 3% 3.51 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 2.48 3% 3.64 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.8% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 43 119 62 76 78 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.1% Very poor	Read 65.5 Write 32.7 Mixed 30 SusWrite 69.6 11% 49.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 13 27% 8.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB 7,947 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 64GB free Firmware: PC4OC70E SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 73 71 73 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 91.8 Write 95.3 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 73.6 58% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 58%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 106GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 43 44 40 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 52.2 Write 58 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 43.1 64% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.1 37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 59%
ST4000DM 000-1CD168 4TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 114GB free, PID 1053 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 45 45 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 89.3 Write 79.7 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 45.6 88% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 0, 0 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 9.6 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HM55-MXM Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock HM55-MXM

CPU
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	11x
Core i5 M 560Intel $65Bench 41%, 10,722 samples	4x
Core i7 M 620IntelBench 42%, 9,076 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
M500 240GBCrucial $79Bench 77%, 31,779 samples	2x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $175Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	11x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16