Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7800 236 User benchmarks, average bench 36% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Memory 33.1 1-Core 16.2 2-Core 38 19% 29.1 Pts	4-Core 38 8-Core 38.2 5% 38.1 Pts	64-Core 25.9 2% 25.9 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 140M 885 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 20D8) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.81% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.65 Parallax 0.19 1% 0.88 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.81% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 129 124 121 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 150 Write 121 Mixed 162 SusWrite 125 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 19.2 65% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 98.5 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 115 86% 113 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 64GB 1,850 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 59GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.9 6.3 5.1 7.8 6.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	7.11% Terrible	Read 24.2 Write 8.5 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 5.9 14% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 62% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.11% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.76% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.4 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.76% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16