| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP300E4C-T06CL |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20131101 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 27 '18 at 01:15 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | CHL-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium B960
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
46.1%
Average
|
53% 84.3 Pts
|
9% 70.8 Pts
|
7% 110 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C652) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
|
1.04%
Terrible
|
1% 1.61 fps
|
1% 1.55 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 141 166 163 162 157 MB/s
|
36.5%
Below average
|
34% 151 MB/s
|
44% 17.1 MB/s
|
72% 116 MB/s
|
|
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 128GB
119GB free, PID 5030
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 27 25 24 24 MB/s
|
21.1%
Poor
|
33% 24.4 MB/s
|
265% 3.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.4%
Average
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
51% 78.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C Builds (Compare 1,057 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 300E4C/300E5C/300E7C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 348x |
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 152x |
| Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples | 93x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $80 |