Acer AcerPower M8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer AcerPower M8 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer EM61SM/EM61PM
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20061229
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 24 '18 at 18:56
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	83%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 3800+ 29 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 94.5 1-Core 30.5 2-Core 29 42% 51.3 Pts	4-Core 31.3 8-Core 30.8 4% 31 Pts	64-Core 30.5 2% 30.5 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 8A9B) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.7 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 23.1 14% 19.2 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 23.4 Splatting 17.8 18% 22.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDP725016GLA 160GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: GMBO SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 10 8.9 13 29 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.7% Terrible	Read 13.6 Write 43.7 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 20.1 19% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.7% Great: 40%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB 4,670 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 220GB free Firmware: GT00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 47 17 57 57 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 46.3 Write 41 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 48 29% 39.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 84% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 46%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.3 4.5 6.2 6.9 6.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	7.98% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 3.4 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 6.1 8% 6.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.9 128% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.98% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.2 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 58.4 68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AcerPower M8 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Acer AcerPower M8

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+AMDBench 39%, 3,286 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 6100NvidiaBench 0%, 335 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Acer AcerPower M8

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Acer AcerPower M8

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)