Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 87% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire E5-772
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170412
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 20 '18 at 14:49
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 35%
CPU Throttled 87%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 106
44% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 096F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 5.34
3% 4.7 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 6.87
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB7S010T 1TB
787GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3310000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 210 202 210 209 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 316
Write 312
Mixed 195
SusWrite 222
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 27
87% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 173
163% 256 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-772 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $220Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback