Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro X9QR7-TF+/X9QRi-F+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9QR7-TF+/X9QRi-F+  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9QR7-TF+/X9QRi-F+
Memory61.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '18 at 14:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-4620 0
SOCKET 0, 4 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Memory 21.3
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 111
28% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 450
40% 339 Pts
64-Core 2,444
151% 2,444 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 31.9%
 Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 98 93 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 55.1
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 94.3
52% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 54.5%
 Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
22GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 17.2
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 17.1
26% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
121% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 14.6%
 Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70DH0-CH9 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
MC Read 19
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.8
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 311
13% 311 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback