Gigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 05:00
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4370-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 194
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 296
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4889
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 5.94
3% 5.29 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.22
5% 5.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 92 95 101 102 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 255
Write 152
Mixed 193
SusWrite 97.3
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 45
176% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 125
97% 131 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 76%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
21GB free
Firmware: 60AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 68 63 70 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 300
Write 119
Mixed 115
SusWrite 69.6
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 36.2
150% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 92.2
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 34
46% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
162GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 107 110 109 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 125
Write 109
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 108
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
184GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 115 111 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 135
Write 122
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 114
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
84GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 58 58 58 58 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 51.6
Write 50.6
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 59.3
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
30GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 41.4
Write 38.4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 13.7
30% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-017.A00LF 9905584-015.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback