Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 4 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65% Good	Memory 69 1-Core 82.6 2-Core 163 60% 105 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 641 57% 484 Pts	64-Core 606 38% 606 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GRID K220Q 29 User benchmarks, average bench 18% Nvidia(10DE 109D) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 370.16 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.8 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 2.38 17% 13 fps	MRender 20.3 Gravity 3.57 Splatting 3.52 7% 9.12 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 129GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,870 Write 2,541 Mixed 2,538 522% 2,317 MB/s	4K Read 121 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 131 409% 120 MB/s	DQ Read 750 DQ Write 614 DQ Mixed 680 510% 681 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 19GB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 52% null MHz 16384, 4080 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 62.6 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 40.7 131% 45.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 14.4 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16