bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory15.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150917
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '18 at 23:03
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 134
56% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 293
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EMC SYMMETRIX 295GB
119GB free
Firmware: 5874
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 56 60 60 59 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
Read 117
Write 94.5
Mixed 130
SusWrite 56.6
22% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 12.1
4K Mixed 15.3
53% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 17.3
13% 17.7 MB/s
EMC SYMMETRIX 242GB
59GB free
Firmware: 5874
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 56 60 61 58 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.8% Poor
Read 128
Write 90.5
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 56.2
21% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 14
50% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 17.8
14% 19.3 MB/s
EMC SYMMETRIX 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: 5874
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 139
Write 83.5
Mixed 132
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 15
51% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 18.4
14% 19.5 MB/s
Vmware Virtual disk 134GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 71 75 75 74 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 64 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.2% Good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback