bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DP67BA
Memory	9.5 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110215
Uptime	17.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '18 at 22:08
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 351 38% 303 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 0344) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	8.72% Terrible	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 8.58 Parallax 10.4 9% 10.1 fps	MRender 8 Gravity 9.1 Splatting 10.5 8% 9.19 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.72% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 287 270 257 232 186 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 445 Mixed 370 SusWrite 271 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 63.2 4K Mixed 42.5 138% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 367 276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 140GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 100 103 103 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 71.5 Write 69 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 102 55% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 74%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 17GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 97.3 Write 46.5 Mixed 42.7 SusWrite 39 42% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G RM51264BA1339.16FD RM51264BA1339.16FD 18GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.2% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 11.2 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 10.8 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,023x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,568x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16