ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell XPS 15 9530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Dell XPS 15 9530 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell XPS 15 9530
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140716
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '14 at 17:41
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4712HQ 5,396 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 88.9 2-Core 164 58% 127 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 476 51% 404 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 32% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M 13,088 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Dell(1028 05FE) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3235 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.85% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 9.42 Parallax 10.3 8% 9.98 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 9.4 Splatting 13.3 10% 12 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.85% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 302GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 155 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 280 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 44 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5150482077	74.4% Very good	Read 492 Write 338 Mixed 351 87% 394 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 18.7 105% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 57.8 49% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 126%
Liteonit LMS-32L6M mSATA 32GB 305 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4GB free Firmware: DM5110E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 989 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 105929 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 240 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 82712 (F2) Unknown 100 100 57995	30.2% Below average	Read 369 Write 80.9 Mixed 130 42% 193 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 2.26 4K Mixed 2.05 38% 9.07 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 63%
Patriot Memory 16GB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 8GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	8.84% Terrible	Read 24.4 Write 12.2 Mixed 12.9 19% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.11 4K Write 0.47 4K Mixed 0.36 47% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.84% Great: 9%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB 775 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 6GB free, PID 005b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 8.23 Mixed 14.5 18% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.56 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.007 21% 1.86 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 8%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical XPS 15 9530 Builds (Compare 1,391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop

Desktop 107%

UFO

Workstation

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: Dell XPS 15 9530

CPU
Core i7-13700HIntelBench 104%, 4,359 samples	526x
Core i9-13900HIntelBench 107%, 5,250 samples	476x
Core i7-4712HQIntelBench 61%, 5,396 samples	265x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples	627x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	264x
RTX 4070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 132%, 10,174 samples	140x

SSD
PC801 SK hynix 1TBNvmeBench 351%, 3,744 samples	163x
KXG80ZNV1T02 KIOXIA 1024GBNvmeBench 319%, 1,016 samples	134x
PM9A1 Samsung 1024GBNvmeBench 322%, 5,261 samples	118x

RAM
HMCG78AEBSA095N 2x16GBUnknownBench 141%, 1,479 samples	228x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBUnknownBench 122%, 4,457 samples	132x
HMCG78MEBSA095N 2x16GBUnknownBench 129%, 3,160 samples	113x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback