Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-A/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160620
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '18 at 17:24
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 63.3 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 184 63% 114 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 521 54% 434 Pts	64-Core 580 36% 580 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	80.3% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 108 Parallax 102 82% 104 fps	MRender 92.7 Gravity 91.9 Splatting 94.9 76% 93.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 8787 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 960 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 541 (64) Unknown 100 100 2561888 (65) Unknown 100 100 366352 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 13 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 96 96 1510 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 710 (B7) Unknown 98 98 17 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 24 100 146030002200 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 8787 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 8787 (E7) Temperature 96 96 4 (E9) Unknown 100 100 4762 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2018 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3735 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3680 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 8787	59.8% Above average	Read 469 Write 190 Mixed 220 64% 293 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 10.8 73% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 19 60% 134 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 82%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 885GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 65536 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 69 (03) Spinup time 130 130 12896239796 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 545 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 960 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 544 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 545 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 545 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 146030002203 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	98.8% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 176 Mixed 155 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.21 93% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 107%
Mass Storage Device 500GB 5,742 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 422GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 39.6 Write 39.9 Mixed 18.6 40% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.38 76% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-012.A00G 2x8GB 1,882 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 15.5 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	393x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	384x
Core i5-7400Intel $91Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	354x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	401x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	349x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	217x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	116x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	69x

RAM
9905678-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 73%, 1,882 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	49x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16