User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	PEGATRON Eureka3
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100128
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '18 at 20:38
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 38 2-Core 76.3 43% 63.7 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 150 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 1469) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.98% Terrible	Lighting 1.07 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 0.34 1% 0.88 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.44 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 0.98% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$50 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 41GB free Firmware: 4.ADA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2269 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 117968451 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3665 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 2034 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 52 554827809 (C2) HDA temperature 33 48 42949672993 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 75 64 175572454 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33.9% Below average	Read 54.5 Write 63.4 Mixed 26.7 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.42 97% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 42%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$50 16,844 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.CHF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8818 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 928727247 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 20515 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 8047 (B8) Unknown 100 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 46 605159460 (C2) HDA temperature 36 54 38654705700 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 74 67 233175817 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	33% Below average	Read 63.1 Write 51.9 Mixed 24.6 34% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.44 86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS728080PLA380 82GB-$33 2,259 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 8GB free Firmware: PF2OA60A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 102 102 12897878210 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2939 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9936 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1749 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3394 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3394 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 249108955171 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	19.5% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 33 Mixed 16.2 21% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.32 93% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 32%
Generic Flash Disk 1GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 1320 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	5.7% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 6.34 Mixed 9.19 12% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.13 4K Mixed 0.12 31% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.7% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16