Dell OptiPlex 7050

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7050
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7050  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 06:32
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 224
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 578
60% 482 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Dell(1028 07A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 8.2
6% 8.1 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 0.3
5% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SPCC M.2 PCIe SS 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038E Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1432 1443 697 122 112 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,874
Write 1,564
Mixed 1293
SusWrite 653
301% 1,346 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 49.9
178% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 503
443% 668 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 203%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K821PJ-MID 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 0 60 20" 1280 720 DEL4079 DELL P2012H
Typical OptiPlex 7050 Builds (Compare 5,002 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7050

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback