Lenovo 82TL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82TL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory17.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 03:41
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS Creator Edition
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 56.1
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 144
52% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 519
47% 397 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B1E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 65.4
24% 44.9 fps
MRender 18.8
Gravity 40
Splatting 25.7
23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00BL2 1TB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 948 746 1031 1082 1081 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,190
Write 972
Mixed 1,081
SusWrite 963
237% 1,052 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 30.2
97% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 335
235% 304 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 150%
Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 28.5
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 19.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 14.5" 1280 720 BOE0AA8
Typical 82TL Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82TL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback