Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 14:48
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31220-$305
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 154
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 282
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2310) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1314 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 43.9
24% 47.3 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 36.7
33% 41.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 27%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EKV100-120G 120GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0817A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 227
Write 204
Mixed 0.5
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 0.9
19% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 19.9
15% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 79%
EK V200 128G 128GB
1GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.6% Poor
Read 210
Write 12.5
Mixed 17
SusWrite 12.7
13% 63 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
70% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
89GB free
Firmware: PA11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 61
Write 66.8
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 83.3
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLFF65F-D8KQ9 8325 FLFF65F-C8KF9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 25% 4 194 28 60 22" 1680 987 NEC67C2 AS221WM
Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 735 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback