Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	122.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '17 at 14:20
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 73.7 1-Core 125 2-Core 248 81% 149 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 772 77% 627 Pts	64-Core 1,014 63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 113 Parallax 97.1 90% 107 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 99.2 Splatting 100 81% 99.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT1050MX300SSD1 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 913GB free Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19495 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 851 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 144 (B4) Unknown 0 0 10392 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 71 57 184684445725 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9782673503 (F7) Unknown 100 100 305817140 (F8) Unknown 100 100 18292678	82.6% Excellent	Read 494 Write 336 Mixed 306 84% 379 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 21.1 111% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 27.7 73% 153 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 85%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 792GB free Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1259 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 218 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 9 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 75 55 193274576921 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2512249123 (F7) Unknown 100 100 78586450 (F8) Unknown 100 100 11103543 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4411 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	87.2% Excellent	Read 482 Write 343 Mixed 341 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 27 114% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 341 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 52.3 101% 205 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 465GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 2,205 Write 1,400 Mixed 1,355 365% 1,653 MB/s	4K Read 59.3 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 50.3 231% 84.9 MB/s	DQ Read 629 DQ Write 385 DQ Mixed 212 237% 409 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 254%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154 14,088 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 400GB free Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 1,523 Write 540 Mixed 672 199% 912 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 85.9 4K Mixed 22.2 135% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 587 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 51.4 144% 315 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 155%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1341 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 255 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 61 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6933251309	120% Outstanding	Read 522 Write 499 Mixed 516 115% 513 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 46.6 171% 63.4 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 170 178% 295 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 124%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7.5TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 77 64 47748118 (03) Spinup time 87 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 249 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 375456568 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -132289287682730 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 250 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 81 81 19 (BE) vendor-specific 73 61 454754331 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1623 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2747 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 73014444059 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 6 47748118 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 138237817390380 (F1) Unknown 100 253 40238744196 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1883242423
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 75 64 30269255 (03) Spinup time 86 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 249 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 374778359 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -63784559311534 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 250 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 73 63 454754331 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1987 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2770 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 77309411355 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 7 30269255 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 108366319846695 (F1) Unknown 100 253 37586860025 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1528521954
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$244 71 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5TB free Firmware: AV01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 83 64 219772947 (03) Spinup time 86 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 250 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 382207280 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 31808527795576 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 251 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BE) vendor-specific 74 62 437911578 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 2246 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2794 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 73014444058 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 8 7 219772947 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 140037408687436 (F1) Unknown 100 253 53225813759 (F2) Unknown 100 253 16738220817
Poor: 32% Great: 109%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 198 197 9058 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 261 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1366 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 259 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 8 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 733 (C2) HDA temperature 125 117 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	78.1% Very good	Read 155 Write 117 Mixed 114 96% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.34 4K Mixed 0.18 92% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 8x16GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	91.4% Outstanding	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 54.5 MC Mixed 30.6 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 21.7 SC Mixed 9.5 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16