Asus PRIME Z370-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-P  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171020
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 17:50
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 232
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 649
70% 554 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (141 fps cap detected)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 142
Parallax 142
114% 141 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 142
Splatting 118
105% 129 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 1TB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,798
Write 4,978
Mixed 5,430
1,205% 5,402 MB/s
4K Read 268
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 167
698% 194 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 605
478% 677 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 133%
Sabrent 2TB
2TB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 252
Write 6.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 40.6
76% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 15.8
1,006% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 22.5
DQ Mixed 20.3
1,526% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 28
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 10,392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $94

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback