AZW U59

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW U59  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW U59
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221101
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 08 '23 at 18:20
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 141
53% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 140
23% 162 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 5.3
4% 5.6 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7.8
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nt-2tb 2280 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12574
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 346
Mixed 364
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 38.6
127% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 221
178% 250 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR CT8G4SFS832A.C8FR 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.5% Above average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical U59 Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: AZW U59

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback