Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte H110M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '17 at 21:10
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 111 2-Core 199 79% 135 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 309 41% 308 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 365C) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.24% Terrible	Lighting 9.13 Reflection 7.92 Parallax 9.38 7% 8.81 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 7.33 Splatting 7.17 7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.24% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 56GB free Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 82446192219099 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1631 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 247 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6295 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7502 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7502 (F2) Unknown 0 0 9737	34.7% Below average	Read 190 Write 54.6 Mixed 82.8 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 55.2 4K Mixed 8.77 74% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 72.2 DQ Write 52.7 DQ Mixed 20.2 26% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 51%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 431GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 170 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 69 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 696 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 69 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 25 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 43 (C2) HDA temperature 113 101 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	94% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 168 Mixed 155 121% 161 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 2.58 4K Mixed 0.22 103% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 165GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 96 181359390 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2561 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 118987728 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 6107 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2094 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 49 589365283 (C2) HDA temperature 35 51 60129542179 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 80 59 47655818 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30.4% Below average	Read 50 Write 55.7 Mixed 67.2 44% 57.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.23 76% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GB 2,041 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11.5 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 59.4 67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	589x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	459x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	459x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	557x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	394x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	240x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	193x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	132x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	89x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $425

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16