MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 242%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 242%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics223% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B77
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 13:06
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$308
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 99.1
1-Core 167
2-Core 328
108% 198 Pts
4-Core 658
8-Core 1,278
115% 968 Pts
64-Core 1,528
95% 1,528 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Palit(1569 F278) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 5125 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Lighting 338
Reflection 287
Parallax 339
276% 321 fps
MRender 366
Gravity 261
Splatting 182
211% 270 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 223%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 M.2 2280 500GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52020100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 255 345 304 304 335 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 473
Mixed 440
SusWrite 322
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 40.8
143% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 303
240% 332 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 108%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
679GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2257 2429 2424 2420 2417 2413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
380% Outstanding
Read 2,612
Write 2,515
Mixed 2225
SusWrite 2,393
549% 2,436 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 69.1
245% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,402
DQ Write 1,022
DQ Mixed 1,166
884% 1,197 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 380%
Great: 633%
Netac NVMe SSD 2TB
987GB free
Firmware: SN09273 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2208 2129 1913 2188 2084 2126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 1,799
Write 2,253
Mixed 1,893
SusWrite 2,108
456% 2,013 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 71.3
235% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,205
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 524
502% 803 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 316%
Great: 606%
Marvell Raid VD 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 567 567 596 575 586 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 634
Write 590
Mixed 259
SusWrite 560
114% 511 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 9.2
84% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 69.3
75% 126 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90%
Great: 113%
Ct500bx5 0 500GB
281GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 44 47 18 44 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 310
Write 34
Mixed 71
SusWrite 64.6
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 11.5
75% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 47.2
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 18.5
40% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-4266C19-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR F4-4266C19-8GTZR F4-3600C16-8GTZR 32GB
3800, 3800, 3800, 3800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 68.4
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 54.1
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 38.1
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 50.8
112% 39.1 GB/s
Latency 40.4
99% 40.4 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) Builds (Compare 312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $851
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback