Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCisco UCSC-C220-M3S  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSC-C220-M3S
Memory121.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '22 at 19:23
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 56.4
2-Core 119
49% 81.4 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 419
39% 323 Pts
64-Core 1,238
77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 499GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 351 350 347 350 354 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
Read 375
Write 332
Mixed 343
SusWrite 349
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 16.3
49% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 83.4
DQ Mixed 102
77% 104 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 84%
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 15 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 212% Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B1K70DH0-YK0 0xCE00 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 0xCE00 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 0xCE00 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 0xCE00 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 0xAD00 HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 0xCE00 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 0xAD00 HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 0xCE00 M393B1K70DH0-YK0 0xCE00 M393B1K70DH0-YK... 128GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.9% Good
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback