User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF-Q GAMING
Memory43.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 06:48
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 127
56% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 471
43% 361 Pts
64-Core 921
57% 921 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.3% Average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 81.5
50% 60.2 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 44.1
45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI512GIMAI298 512GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC1S0378
SusWrite @10s intervals: 532 568 583 582 601 609 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,192
Write 1,017
Mixed 836
SusWrite 579
203% 906 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 44.6
146% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 371
DQ Mixed 436
307% 386 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 145%
Great: 250%
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
59GB free
Firmware: .5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 200 201 200 205 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
623GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 153 154 151 154 156 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
715GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 175 181 177 182 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS723020BLE640 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: AAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 174 171 175 173 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CK0 36JSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CK0 64GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 34.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback