Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	6.42% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2720QM-$85 7,798 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Memory 47 1-Core 26.5 2-Core 51.1 28% 41.5 Pts	4-Core 66.3 8-Core 47 8% 56.7 Pts	64-Core 68 4% 68 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kimmidi TB900 128GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 15 23 47 63 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	6.42% Terrible	Read 47 Write 52.2 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 29.4 11% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 2.3 9% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 6.42% Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 430GB free Firmware: AM0P2C SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.7 7.5 9.3 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.7% Terrible	Read 16.1 Write 17.3 Mixed 16.8 SusWrite 10.6 11% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 7.7% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 04CB AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 04CB AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.7% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.3 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	227x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	170x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	16x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 45%, 885 samples	12x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $113

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16