PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T1600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T1600 (all builds) |
Memory | 21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180705 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 06 '22 at 16:14 |
Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
69.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 438 347 288 288 287 MB/s
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
233GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 235 243 249 251 252 MB/s
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
251GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 83 85 87 86 MB/s
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples | 195x |
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples | 160x |
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples | 96x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 51x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 46x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |