Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 2020M 9,778 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 64 2-Core 128 52% 86.4 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 127 17% 127 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.47% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.83 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.47% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB 2,483 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN09628 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 413 400 409 338 369 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 382 Write 333 Mixed 364 SusWrite 386 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 26.6 88% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 188 145% 198 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 11.3 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 12.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	466x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	107x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	98x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 3,567 samples	48x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,855 samples	46x
RMT3170EB68E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 29%, 609 samples	18x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $128

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16