Acer Aspire Z1620

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire Z1620  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z1620
Memory5.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '21 at 00:55
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G645-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 59.9
44% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 74.5
8-Core 67.2
10% 70.8 Pts
64-Core 74.2
5% 74.2 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (PHDGD Omega 5.0)
Acer(1025 0608) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 5.0.64.2016
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 117 96 108 124 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 95
Write 65.2
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 111
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F Unifosa HU6E4404EP0200 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Z1620 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z1620

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback