Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 06:41
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 93.9
44% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 335
40% 310 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.1
0% 1 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 2
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 76 89 92 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 85.7
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
103GB free
Firmware: 4.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 88 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 86.6
Write 49.7
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 86.9
50% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
53GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 26 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 23.7
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 25.2
33% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F1C BenQ RL2455
Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $220
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback