Samsung 700G7C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 700G7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP700G7C-S02US
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140311
Uptime27.4 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 18:08
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 167
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 397
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 675M
Sanyo(144D C0D0) 2GB
CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 1.8
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 179 174 171 173 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 453
Write 266
Mixed 230
SusWrite 179
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 30.1
111% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 120
136% 237 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 100%
Sandisk i100 8GB
7GB free
Firmware: 11.56.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 129
Write 28.1
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 28.6
12% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 6.2
35% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 970GB
851GB free
Firmware: MCC3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 15 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.99% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 15.4
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 16.1
14% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 2R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 3% 71 12 7 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0F9D C27R50x
History: Score 19: 3R 1G 1B | Score 10: 2R 0G 0B
Typical 700G7C Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700G7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback